top of page
スクリーンショット 2024-06-08 13.38.23.png

ASIA MASSAGE
C HAMPIONSHIP 2026  

Tournament Results

Thank you so much for all your entries!!

Oil Massage Department

AMC_C_19h07_260603_49991.png

🥇1st place🥇

Mazlin Mazlan

Evaluation Score: 52 points

🥈2nd place🥈

Chiharu

Evaluation Score: 51.5 points

🥉3rd place🥉

MASATO SONOBE

Evaluation Score: 50.16 points

4th

KAYABA KUMIKO

Evaluation Score: 49.16 points

5th

阿山夕貴

Evaluation Score: 48 points

6th

Sumiko 

Evaluation Score: 47.33 points ※1

7th

Yasunari Kawani

Evaluation Score: 47.33 points ※1

8th

Kiyomi

Evaluation Score: 47.16 points

9th

ゆっくん

Evaluation Score: 47 points

10th

Maho Nakaide

Evaluation Score: 46.83 points

Audience Award

森 厘香

※1 Determining Rankings in Case of a Tie

The scores shown have been truncated to two decimal places for easier readability. Tournament rankings were determined based on the full, untruncated values.

When competitors have the same total score, final rankings are determined according to the judging guidelines, using the following tiebreaker criteria in order of priority:

① Impression Score The overall impression score given by the judges is compared first as the highest priority.

② Massage Technique Score If a tie remains after comparing ①, the massage technique score is compared next.

③ Sequential Comparison of Innovation, Posture, and Flow Scores If a tie still remains after comparing ②, scores are compared in the following order based on the priority of the judging criteria: innovation, treatment posture, and treatment flow.

Final rankings are determined by applying the criteria above in sequence.

Body Care Massage
Department

AMC_C_18h35_260603_48691.png

🥇1st place🥇

Şanal Yasin

Evaluation Score: 54.42 points

  • Instagram

🥈2nd place🥈

雨盛 詢

Evaluation Score: 54.28 points

  • Instagram

🥉3rd Place🥉

HIROYUKI TASHIRO

Evaluation Score: 53.57 points ※1

  • Instagram

4th

Aksu Tayyar

Evaluation Score: 53.57 points ※1

5th

加藤優一

Evaluation Score: 52.28 points

6th

海東 清

Evaluation Score: 52.14 points ※1

7th

YAMADA MIKI

Evaluation Score: 52.14 points ※1

8th

小垣内 正幸

Evaluation Score: 52 points

9th

ゆっくん

Evaluation Score: 51.57 points

10th

Koki Miyata

Evaluation Score: 51.14 points

Audience Award

冨樫倫子

  • ※1 Determining Rankings in Case of a Tie

  • The scores shown have been truncated to two decimal places for easier readability. Tournament rankings were determined based on the full, untruncated values.

  • When competitors have the same total score, final rankings are determined according to the judging guidelines, using the following tiebreaker criteria in order of priority:

  • ① Impression Score The overall impression score given by the judges is compared first as the highest priority.

  • ② Massage Technique Score If a tie remains after comparing ①, the massage technique score is compared next.

  • ③ Sequential Comparison of Innovation, Posture, and Flow Scores If a tie still remains after comparing ②, scores are compared in the following order based on the priority of the judging criteria: innovation, treatment posture, and treatment flow.

  • Final rankings are determined by applying the criteria above in sequence.

Facial Massage
Department

AMC_C_18h49_260603_49301.png

🥇1st place🥇

ふくあつ先生

Evaluation Score: 57.22 points

🥈2nd place🥈

春山 眞妃侶

Evaluation Score: 56.88 points

🥉3rd Place🥉

Janie Wang

Evaluation Score: 55.55 points

4th

真下恵

Evaluation Score: 55.33 points

5th

Chika.

Evaluation Score: 53.88 points ※1

6th

美崎 全衣子

Evaluation Score: 53.88 points ※1

7th

三谷 麗奈

Evaluation Score: 53.77 points

8th

康雅潔 KANG YACHIEH

Evaluation Score: 53.66 points

9th

葉 恩霏

Evaluation Score: 53.55 points

10th

作見 憲造

Evaluation Score: 53.33 points

Audience Award

春山 眞妃侶

※1 Determining Rankings in Case of a Tie

The scores shown have been truncated to two decimal places for easier readability. Tournament rankings were determined based on the full, untruncated values.

When competitors have the same total score, final rankings are determined according to the judging guidelines, using the following tiebreaker criteria in order of priority:

① Impression Score The overall impression score given by the judges is compared first as the highest priority.

② Massage Technique Score If a tie remains after comparing ①, the massage technique score is compared next.

③ Sequential Comparison of Innovation, Posture, and Flow Scores If a tie still remains after comparing ②, scores are compared in the following order based on the priority of the judging criteria: innovation, treatment posture, and treatment flow.

Final rankings are determined by applying the criteria above in sequence.

Thai Traditional
Massage Department

AMC_C_18h18_260603_48151.png

🥇1st place🥇

TONPHOOKHIEO SUPAWADEE

Evaluation Score: 59.57 points

🥈2nd place🥈

Déhlia Lapeyrie | ŌMIRI

Evaluation Score: 58.42 points

🥉3rd Place🥉

Ikeda Momoko

Evaluation Score: 58.42 points

4th

坂田雄輝

Evaluation Score: 57.14 points

5th

内山 冴恵

Evaluation Score: 56 points ※1

6th

新間 実佳

Evaluation Score: 56 points ※1

7th

華代

Evaluation Score: 55.57 points

8th

AI

Evaluation Score: 54.85 points

9th

前田 和香

Evaluation Score: 54.28 points

10th

YOSHINO

Evaluation Score: 53.85 points

Audience Award

野田

高木らん

※1 Determining Rankings in Case of a Tie

The scores shown have been truncated to two decimal places for easier readability. Tournament rankings were determined based on the full, untruncated values.

When competitors have the same total score, final rankings are determined according to the judging guidelines, using the following tiebreaker criteria in order of priority:

① Impression Score The overall impression score given by the judges is compared first as the highest priority.

② Massage Technique Score If a tie remains after comparing ①, the massage technique score is compared next.

③ Sequential Comparison of Innovation, Posture, and Flow Scores If a tie still remains after comparing ②, scores are compared in the following order based on the priority of the judging criteria: innovation, treatment posture, and treatment flow.

Final rankings are determined by applying the criteria above in sequence.

Western Freestyle
Massage 
Category

AMC_C_19h23_260603_50611.png

🥇1st place🥇

Déhlia Lapeyrie | ŌMIRI

Evaluation Score: 62.16 points

🥈2nd place🥈

Al Poliarco

Evaluation Score: 58 points

🥉3rd Place🥉

Tatar Cengizhan

Evaluation Score: 57.16 points

4th

Lim sim zher

Evaluation Score: 56.5 points

5th

RYAN

Evaluation Score: 56.33 points

6th

加藤優一

Evaluation Score: 55.33 points

7th

JoJo

Evaluation Score: 54.66 points

8th

夏八木ゆうな

Evaluation Score: 54.5 points

9th

難波 舞

Evaluation Score: 54 points

10th

NAOMI MORITA

Evaluation Score: 53.66 points

Audience Award

簗迫 龍王

※1 Determining Rankings in Case of a Tie

The scores shown have been truncated to two decimal places for easier readability. Tournament rankings were determined based on the full, untruncated values.

When competitors have the same total score, final rankings are determined according to the judging guidelines, using the following tiebreaker criteria in order of priority:

① Impression Score The overall impression score given by the judges is compared first as the highest priority.

② Massage Technique Score If a tie remains after comparing ①, the massage technique score is compared next.

③ Sequential Comparison of Innovation, Posture, and Flow Scores If a tie still remains after comparing ②, scores are compared in the following order based on the priority of the judging criteria: innovation, treatment posture, and treatment flow.

Final rankings are determined by applying the criteria above in sequence.

Eatearn Freestyle
Massage Department

AMC_C_19h35_260603_51201.png

🥇1st place🥇

Al Poliarco

Evaluation Score: 62.75 points

🥈2nd place🥈

Lim sim zher

Evaluation Score: 60.75 points

🥉3rd place🥉

JoJo

Evaluation Score: 58.5 points

4th

Aksu Tayyar

Evaluation Score: 57.37 points

5th

MUMEI

Evaluation Score: 55.75 points

6th

HO YU CHIEH

Evaluation Score: 55.5 points ※1

7th

伊藤空

Evaluation Score: 55.5 points ※1

8th

おたえ

Evaluation Score: 54.25 points

9th

吉井まお

Evaluation Score: 53.87 points

10th

東奈緒

Evaluation Score: 53.87 points

Audience Award

佐藤香織

※1 Determining Rankings in Case of a Tie

The scores shown have been truncated to two decimal places for easier readability. Tournament rankings were determined based on the full, untruncated values.

When competitors have the same total score, final rankings are determined according to the judging guidelines, using the following tiebreaker criteria in order of priority:

① Impression Score The overall impression score given by the judges is compared first as the highest priority.

② Massage Technique Score If a tie remains after comparing ①, the massage technique score is compared next.

③ Sequential Comparison of Innovation, Posture, and Flow Scores If a tie still remains after comparing ②, scores are compared in the following order based on the priority of the judging criteria: innovation, treatment posture, and treatment flow.

Final rankings are determined by applying the criteria above in sequence.

bottom of page